Abstrak RSS

A Short Review On The Current Geographical Indications Protection In Indonesia

A Short Review On The Current Geographical Indications Protection In Indonesia
Miranda Risang Ayu, S.H., LL.M., PH.D. CAN
Universitas Padjadjaran, Refleksi Dinamika Hukum Rangkaian Pemikiran Dalam Dekade Terakhir "Analisis Komprehensif Tentang Hukum Oleh 63 Akademisi Dan Praktisi Hukum Didedikasikan untuk Tokoh Hukum : Prof. Dr. Komar Kantaatmadja, S.H., LL.M, Perum Percetakan Negara RI, 2008
Bahasa Inggris
Universitas Padjadjaran, Refleksi Dinamika Hukum Rangkaian Pemikiran Dalam Dekade Terakhir "Analisis Komprehensif Tentang Hukum Oleh 63 Akademisi Dan Praktisi Hukum Didedikasikan untuk Tokoh Hukum : Prof. Dr. Komar Kantaatmadja, S.H., LL.M, Perum Percetakan Negara RI, 2008

Geographical Indications in The Republic of Indonesian Trade Marks Law Number 15 Year 2001. According to Article 56 (1) of Law Number 15 Year 2001: Geographical Indications shall be protected as a sign which indicates the place of origin of a good, which due to its geographical environment factors, including natural, human and the combination of both factors, gives a specific characteristic and quality on a good produced therein.= ‘ The background of regulating Geographical Indication is because of the ratification of the Agreement Establishing WTO/TRIPS and not because of the Lisbon Agreement,1958. In Indonesian Trade Marks Law Number 15, 2001, there are notions of Geographical Indications’ protections as follows: 1. there are two explicit regulated subject matters: Geographical Indication and Source of Origin (Indication of Source). 2. there are no provisions in accordance with TRIPS additional protection, similar with Controlled Appellation of Origins, in respect to wines and spirits. The absence of the second level protection or additional protection is a problem for the same reason as the lack of reputation requirement in the Indonesian Trade Marks Law definition. Being a predominantly Islamic country, some people may argue that providing protection for wines and spirits could be regarded as contrary to the public morality in Indonesia’. However, this argument.

Download: .Full Papers